Subscribe DomainTools 
posts Subscribe

Tim Oreilly on his Domain

November 30th, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

Oreilly WebsiteOne of the blogs I love to read is Tim O’Reilly because he covers a lot of technical moving and shaking which is going on. In one of his posts this month Tim talked about Bill O’Reilly and how people confuse Tim with Bill. Both guys have rather large public profiles however Tim runs a technical publishing empire and Bill hosts a TV show on Fox. Tim went on to describe how visitors direct navigate to Tim’s Oreilly.com site and see all the technical material yet they still think that the site has something to do with Bill.

One of Bill’s visitors writes in to Tim:

Is this just a website to make more money for O’Reilly????? How can I get in touch with him? This is very important!!! I am more interested in the news than in buying something. Please contact me.

This goes to show how direct navigation effects everything on the Internet. People instinctively type in where they want to go. This behavior can not be un-learned, typing where you want to go will never fade away. This is a strong indication that investing in generic targeted domains is always a good move. If people want something they will simple type it in. By controlling the domains we control what people see, currently our domain monetization industry makes about a Billion Dollars a year. But if you extend the reach of what you call the Direct Navigation industry you will see that it effect not just domainers but other people that build companies on good intuitive domains. There is a certain boost to the marketing effect of a company that builds a business on a preexisting intuitive brands.

Least ResistanceIf you want to learn about things to do in San Francisco why not just type in SanFrancisco.com and see what appears. As time goes by all the intuitive brands on the Internet that are simple parking pages will morph into the things that people think they should be. The path of least resistance is a law of nature. All things have to obey it. The majority of hikers take the past of least resistance. Water always flows downhill and Internet Traffic always types in what it believes is the most intuitive brand.

The Chicken and the Egg can be argued for hours at length regarding domain names. Does a site exist because of its name or does a site exist because someone invented the brand. Most sites exist because someone branded them however a lot of developers build sites because the domain demands it. Those domains will themselves into existence.

The successful domainer is the one that hears the call of the domain and allows it to exist. The domain practically does the rest of the work.

Posted in Direct Navigation | 10 Comments »

Dell vs Florida Registrars

November 28th, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

DellThree Florida Registrars were named in a lawsuit by Dell on November 16th; all this is just coming to the surface now. Those three registrars are BelgiumDomains, CapitolDomains, and DomainDoorman. They also have a few sister companies such as Netrian Ventures and IHoldings.com that were named too. Dell personally named Juan Pablo “JP” Vazquez because he was on the incorporation paperwork for most of these companies. Dell has a feeling there are 10 other John Does as well that could be related and is seeking the true identity of those companies as well as naming them in the suit. John Berryhill sent me over a copy of the lawsuit today and I have been reading through it. You can read the main document and the supporting doc 1, and supporting doc 2.

This is a bad day for Domain Tasting (a term I coined). This is a good day for Trademark watchdogs. Several companies have noticed this lawsuit and are re-thinking domain tasting.

UPDATE: We ran some stats, and according to our internal data, those three registrars are responsible for 72.5% of all domain tasting in the last 6 months (That is 185,650,068 of the 255,212,260 domains which were tasted).

10/10/2007 1 COMPLAINT for Cybersquatting, Trademark
Infringement, Counterfeiting, Dilution, and Unfair Competition against
IHoldings.com, Inc., Juan Pablo Vazquez, Does 1-10, BelgiumDomains, LLC,
CapitolDomains LLC, DomainDoorman, LLC, Netrian Ventures LTD. Filing fee $
350. Receipt#: 541230, filed by Dell Inc., Alienware Corporation.
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-5# 2 Exhibit 6 - 10)(nt) (Entered: 11/20/2007)

10/10/2007 2 Summons Issued as to BelgiumDomains, LLC. (nt)
(Entered: 11/20/2007)
10/10/2007 3 Summons Issued as to CapitolDomains LLC. (nt)
(Entered: 11/20/2007)
10/10/2007 4 Summons Issued as to DomainDoorman, LLC. (nt)
(Entered: 11/20/2007)
10/10/2007 5 Summons Issued as to Netrian Ventures LTD.. (nt)
(Entered: 11/20/2007)
10/10/2007 6 Summons Issued as to IHoldings.com, Inc.. (nt)
(Entered: 11/20/2007)
10/10/2007 7 Summons Issued as to Juan Pablo Vazquez. (nt)
(Entered: 11/20/2007)

10/10/2007 8 MOTION for Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order,
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Dell Inc., Alienware Corporation.
Responses due by 10/24/2007 (nt) (Entered: 11/20/2007)

10/10/2007 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re 8 MOTION for Temporary
Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Dell Inc.,
Alienware Corporation. (nt) (Entered: 11/20/2007)

10/10/2007 10 MOTION for Ex Parte Seizure Order, MOTION for
Accelerated Discovery, and an Order Sealing the File by Dell Inc., Alienware
Corporation. Responses due by 10/24/2007 (nt) (Entered: 11/20/2007)

10/10/2007 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re 10 MOTION seizure order,
accelerated discovery, and an order sealing the file filed by Dell Inc.,
Alienware Corporation. (nt) (Entered: 11/20/2007)

10/10/2007 12 DECLARATION signed by : David J. Steele. by Dell
Inc., Alienware Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-D# 2 Exhibit E-G# 3
Exhibit H-J# 4 Exhibit K-Q)(nt) (Entered: 11/20/2007)

10/10/2007 13 DECLARATION signed by : Kate Burns. by Dell Inc.,
Alienware Corporation. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

10/10/2007 14 DECLARATION signed by : Arthur Lewis. by Dell Inc.,
Alienware Corporation. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

10/10/2007 15 DECLARATION signed by : Mimi L. Sall. by Dell Inc.,
Alienware Corporation. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

10/10/2007 16 NOTICE of Docket Correction: Document Filed in Wrong
Case; Redocketed in 03CV80612 as DE# 1971 (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

10/10/2007 17 MOTION for Limited Appearance, Consent to
Designation and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic
Filings for Howard Kroll, Filing Fee $75, Receipt #541231. (nt) (Entered:
11/21/2007)

10/10/2007 18 MOTION for Limited Appearance, Consent to
Designation and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic
Filings for David J. Steele, Filing Fee $75, Receipt #541231. (nt) (Entered:
11/21/2007)

10/10/2007 19 MOTION to Seal. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

10/10/2007 20 Sealed Document Tracking Form. (nt) (Entered:
11/21/2007)

10/15/2007 21 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Joan A. Lenard recused. Case
reassigned to Judge Adalberto Jordan for all further proceedingsSigned by
Judge Joan A. Lenard on 10/12/07.(nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/05/2007 22 ORDER granting 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining
Order and setting hearing on 11/16/07 at 1:30 re 8 motion for preliminary
injunction.Signed by Judge Adalberto Jordan on 11/2/07. (nt) (Entered:
11/21/2007)

11/05/2007 23 ORDER granting 10 Motion for seizure order, granting
10 Motion for Discovery, granting 19 Motion to Seal.Signed by Judge
Adalberto Jordan on 11/2/07. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/05/2007 24 EMERGENCY MOTION to Supplement 23 Order on Motion
for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Discovery, Order on Motion to
Seal by Dell Inc., Alienware Corporation. Responses due by 11/20/2007 (nt)
(Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/07/2007 25 EMERGENCY MOTION to Supplement 23 Seizure Order on
Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion for Discovery, Order on
Motion to Seal by Dell Inc., Alienware Corporation. Responses due by
11/23/2007 (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/07/2007 26 NOTICE of Filing Bond by Dell Inc., Alienware
Corporation pursuant to 23 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order
on Motion for Discovery, Order on Motion to Seal (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/08/2007 27 NOTICE of Filing Bond by Dell Inc., Alienware
Corporation re 22 Order on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (nt)
(Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/09/2007 28 ORDER granting 24 Motion to Supplement Seizure
Order.Signed by Judge Adalberto Jordan on 11/6/07. (nt) (Entered:
11/21/2007)

11/09/2007 29 ORDER granting 25 Motion to Supplement.Signed by
Judge Adalberto Jordan on 11/7/07. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/14/2007 30 Skipped Docket Entry. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)
11/14/2007 31 Skipped Docket Entry. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)
11/14/2007 32 Skipped Docket Entry. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)
11/14/2007 33 Skipped Docket Entry. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)
11/14/2007 36 NOTICE of Filing Inventory by Dell Inc., Alienware
Corporation (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/14/2007 37 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Protective Order by Dell
Inc., Alienware Corporation (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/15/2007 34 Skipped Docket Entry. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/15/2007 35 Skipped Docket Entry. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/15/2007 40 NOTICE of Filing Discovery: Answer to
Interrogatories by Juan Pablo Vazquez.(nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 38 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard Baron on
behalf of Juan Pablo Vazquez (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 39 MOTION to Seal. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 41 NOTICE of Filing Discovery: Response to Request to
Produce by Juan Pablo Vazquez.(nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 43 NOTICE of Filing Certificates of Non-Appearance by
defendants by Dell Inc., Alienware Corporation (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 44 NOTICE of Filing Returns of Service by Dell Inc.,
Alienware Corporation (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 44 SUMMONS Returned Executed BelgiumDomains, LLC served
on 11/9/2007, answer due 11/29/2007. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 44 SUMMONS Returned Executed CapitolDomains LLC served
on

11/9/2007, answer due 11/29/2007. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 44 SUMMONS Returned Executed DomainDoorman, LLC served
on
11/9/2007, answer due 11/29/2007. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 44 SUMMONS Returned Executed IHoldings.com, Inc. served
on 11/9/2007, answer due 11/29/2007. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 44 SUMMONS Returned Executed Netrian Ventures LTD.
served on 11/9/2007, answer due 11/29/2007. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 44 SUMMONS Returned Executed Juan Pablo Vazquez served
on 11/9/2007, answer due 11/29/2007. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 45 MOTION to Unseal Case by Dell Inc., Alienware
Corporation. Responses due by 12/3/2007 (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 47 ORDER denying 18 Motion for Limited Appearance,
Consent to Designation and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of
Electronic Filings of Attorney David J. Steele.Signed by Judge Adalberto
Jordan on
11/15/07. (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/16/2007 48 ORDER denying 17 Motion for Limited Appearance,
Consent to Designation and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of
Electronic Filings. Signed by Judge Adalberto Jordan on 11/15/07. (nt)
(Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/20/2007 54 SUMMONS Returned Executed (nt) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/21/2007 50 ORDER granting 45 Motion to Unseal Case with the
exception of docket entry 42.Signed by Judge Adalberto Jordan on 11/16/07.
(nt) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/21/2007 (nt). (Entered:
11/21/2007)

11/21/2007 51 PROTECTIVE ORDER Regarding Confidential
Information.Signed by Judge Adalberto Jordan on 11/16/07.(nt) (Entered:
11/21/2007)

11/21/2007 52 ORDER Extending Temporary Restraining Order against
defendant Vazquez.Signed by Judge Adalberto Jordan on 11/20/07.(nt)
(Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/21/2007 53 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION against the registrar
defendants and corporate defendants.Signed by Judge Adalberto Jordan on
11/20/07. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Part 1# 2 Exhibit A - Part 2)(nt)
(Entered: 11/21/2007)

11/26/2007 55 Amended MOTION to Amend/Correct Motion of David J.
Steele to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Dell Inc., Alienware Corporation. Responses
due by 12/10/2007 (Sall, Mimi) (Entered: 11/26/2007)

11/26/2007 56 Amended MOTION to Amend/Correct Motion of Howard A
Kroll to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Dell Inc., Alienware Corporation. Responses
due by 12/10/2007 (Sall, Mimi) (Entered: 11/26/2007)

11/26/2007 Attorney David J. Steele terminated per 47. Sent
terminated attorney(s) instructions for tracking future case activity. (tb)
(Entered: 11/26/2007)

11/26/2007 57 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re 52 Order, 51 Order, 53
Preliminary Injunction, 50 Order on Motion to Unseal Case Certificate of
Service by Mimi Lee Sall on behalf of Dell Inc., Alienware Corporation
(Sall, Mimi) (Entered: 11/26/2007)

11/26/2007 58 NOTICE by Dell Inc., Alienware Corporation Notice of
Filing Inventory (Sall, Mimi) (Entered: 11/26/2007)

Posted in Domain Tasting | 38 Comments »

Network Solutions Enhanced Whois

Submit to Digg.com!

November 27th, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

Enhanced Business Listing
Want to place an ad inside your own whois record? Network Solutions has decided to offer this service to all their customers. Instead of just displaying contact information and your address you can now place whatever text you want inside the record. This, “Enhanced Business Listing” allows owners to place more descriptive text inside their whois record. When anyone looked up the whois record they would see your opening sales pitch before they even approach you about buying your domain. Sounds like a great idea to me. The listing costs $12 a year, which seems a bit expensive to me but I am sure people will buy it. Buy why would you buy this service if you also bought Whois Privacy? Read Network Solutions full press release about the service. If you are trying to protect your information then this is not the service for you. Whois Privacy and this service are completely opposite each other. For more information on the Enhanced Business Listing service check out their page on it.

The weird part about this service is that you are advertising on your own whois record, why should it cost money to advertise on your own record?

What would be a more valuable service would be if they verified information about your company and put that in the whois. Such as, Registered Doctor in New York City. If the registrar could authenticate claims I can guarantee Search Engines would use those authenticated claims and boost the sites in their index based on those claims. Now that would be an enhanced whois service! I pitched that exact service to Network Solutions about 3 years ago.

Posted in Network Solutions, Whois | 7 Comments »

Be Like Frank

Submit to Digg.com!

November 25th, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

While on Vacation I took a “Be like Frank” photo. If only it was that easy to be like Frank.

Frank Schilling B Jay Like Frank

Posted in Frank Schilling | 4 Comments »

Reverse Domain Hijacking

Submit to Digg.com!

November 25th, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

Court UdrpIn my last post I covered the UDRP process, now it is time to look at Reverse Domain Name Hi-Jackers. People who file complaints to steal domains from domain owners. As sure as domains are getting more valuable, everyone can rest assured that there will more legal action and not less action. More legal action signals that more value. If people want domains they are either going to buy them fairly or try and fight for them in court. I want to cover the UDRP case of Barnes & Noble vs Noble.com in this post. Noble.com was registered in 1994 long before Barnes & Noble started their website. Just looking at the title of the UDRP it would be easy to imagine that the big corporation is trying to steal the domain in a UDRP fight. Reverse Domain Name Hi-Jacking is when someone abuses the UDRP process and tries to legalese the current owner out of a domain. Domainers have been victims of this type of attack for a long time. However, most UDRP cases are straight forward infringement and are easy to decide. Every once in a while you get an over reaching corporation that is greedy and thinks they can steal a domain name by abusing the process.

The Noble.com case is not so clear when you review the history of the domain. Just look at the Thumbnail history on the website…

Noble 1 Noble 2
Updated: 2007-10-05 Updated: 2007-07-24
 
Noble 3 Noble 4
Updated: 2005-05-04 Updated: 2004-12-22
 
Noble 5 Noble 6
Updated: 2004-09-13 Updated: 2004-07-29

We can see that Noble.com is redirecting and displaying Amazon.com ads. It is not very hard to argue that consumers would be confused if they went to a website called Noble.com and they saw an online bookstore. You can do a lot of things with the domain but advertising and redirecting to Amazon.com is not one of them.

The UDRP case was dismissed and Noble.com stayed with the original owner. UDRP has a three step test; Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires that Complainant must prove each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be cancelled or transferred:

(1) the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; (2) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and (3) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.

  • Is the domain confusingly similar: YES
  • Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests: NO
  • Registered in bad faith and that it is being used in bad faith: NO & YES

Had this case gone before a US court I am sure it would have gone the other way. Just because someone legitimately own a generic domain name doesn’t mean they are allowed to confuse people. A good example would be if someone like Goggle.com, a dictionary word, had started a search engine on their website; now that would confuse the public. Selling Goggles on Goggle.com would be reasonable but operating a search engine would not be. It all depends on how you use the domain name. UDRP cases have a higher burden then court cases. Courts don’t have a three prong test like the UDRP does.

So inclusion some cases that look like Reverse Domain HiJacking aren’t as clear as they appear on the surface. Just based on the Title of this case I thought it was initially Reverse HiJacking but after reviewing the Thumbnail history I see bad faith in the use of the domain owner.

Posted in UDRP Cases | 14 Comments »

UDRP Process

Submit to Digg.com!

November 24th, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

Legal ScalesA lot of people wonder how to file a case against a domain owner. Instead of going to court there is a process built into the ICANN process. Every domain owner agrees to be bound by the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) when they register a top level domain such as DotCom, it is part of the contract that most people never bother to read when they are buying a domain.

There are currently three providers that hear cases and make binding rulings. A UDRP is much cheaper then a court case and is preferred if you think you have an easy decision. However I would encourage anyone that wants to file a complain to first approach the domain owner and see if you can work out a deal. Sometimes the owner is behind privacy and it is not possible to contact them so you will be left with just filing.

Here are the three providers:

Top Citied Cases in Response:

Cited Case Number Domain Name Frequency
D2000-0161 zero.com 97
D2002-0189 paparazzo.com 94
D2000-1654 tammy.com 72
D2000-1840 firstamerican.com 70
D2000-0752 shutterbug.com 70
D2001-0031 sweeps.com 68
D2001-0764 matress.com 67

Top Citied Cases in Complaint

Cited Case Number Domain Name Frequency
D2000-0003 telstra.org 1385
D2000-0163 veuveclicquot.org 484
D2000-1409 calsony.com 322
D2000-0028 cellularonechina.com 310
D2000-0226 christiandior.com 265
D2000-0137 xpediatravel.com 261
D2000-0847 madonna.com 235
D2001-0903 okidataparts.com 227
D2003-0696 pepsiadventure.com 216

Posted in UDRP Cases | 4 Comments »

Exposing the longest long tail

Submit to Digg.com!

November 24th, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

Smallest TailWhen a domain is about to delete at most registrars they will switch the DNS over to the registrar’s name server. If the domain is getting good traffic then the registrar may renew the domain for themselves or they may just monetize the domain while it is in the deleting queue. However when a domain has never had DNS before and this switch over triggers an event in our database saying that it is a new domain. It is actually sort of amusing. The first time we see the domain is right before it deletes. It has exist for 3 years but we are just now seeing it. The owner even paid the renewal fee last year. The likelihood that the domain has traffic is actually very low. Thanks to registrars trying to make money off of expiring customers they are helping expose the longest of the long tail. We never would have known about this domain or the fact that it had existed for three years without this broadcast event.

I was looking at one case today, Paul Tuminaro.com. The domain has been registered since 2004 but it has been invisible to the web because it had no name servers until today when it appeared on the Internet for the first time and was hosted on the name server of PendingRenewalDeletion.com. Very odd for a brand new domain to appear on a pending to delete name server. The domain will be online for about 30 days before it is finally deleted next month. The life cycle of the domain is very complex. All domains right before they die are broadcast to the world. So I am sure this domain will be resurrected by a domain taster that will try it out for a few days, see that it has no traffic and return it to dead. This will happen a few times. Perhaps several times each year actually. The echoing effects of dead domains mean that any idea once registered never dies. Register it once and it lives forever even if you fail to pay the renewal fee.

Posted in Domain Tasting | 6 Comments »

BlackFriday.com

Submit to Digg.com!

November 23rd, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

Blackfriday.comA few more Holiday domains are occurring this week. Yesterday I talked about ThanksGiving.com and today we have the biggest shopping day of the year celebrated by BlackFriday.com. Not many people are at work today so they are heading into the stores and getting the holiday kicked off by buying lots of Christmas goodies. I bet BlackFriday.com makes at least $50 on direct navigation traffic just today alone. That is enough to pay the yearly renewal bill.

Cybermonday.comOf course when the weekend is over we will head into CyberMonday.com. A closer look at CyberMonday.com and I noticed that it was powered by Shop.org. I had never heard of Shop.org but they were using the power of a generic domain to draw visitors to their site. You have to think that the people at Shop.org understand and appreciate domains because they have setup a dedicated site just for the people that direct navigate.

One has to wonder, is CyberMonday bigger then BlackFriday? I would suspect CyberMonday is actually much smaller. Wallmart out sells Amazon.com 300 to 1 easily. People just don’t buy online as much as they do in the real world. Perhaps that will change in the future, but not in the next 10 years for sure.

Posted in Holiday | 4 Comments »

Happy “Scott Day” Day

November 22nd, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

Thanksgiving DotcomHappy “Scott Day” Day. I bet Scott’s traffic is up today. I know I visited just to check out who the owner of the Thanksgiving.com domain was. The power of generic holidays is awesome. They always get a spike on their day and then they go dark for about 11 months. The traffic slowly builds up next year about one month before the holiday actually takes place. I visit these domains just to see who owns them, then I see it is someone like Scott and I put my checkbook away and go back to enjoying the Holiday. Have a happy Thanksgiving.com everyone.

Posted in Vacation | 9 Comments »

Reinclusion Request into Google

November 21st, 2007 by Jay Westerdal

Google WebtoolsI get this questions a lot, “Does parking your domain hurt your domain’s resale value?” The answer, Yes. You will be hurting the Internal Search Engine scores attached to the domain. Search Engines are more temporal then you would imagine. It is not about having the best site right now, it is often about having a history of being the best site. Credibility doesn’t come overnight so don’t expect your search engine rankings to either. By parking a domain that you plan to develop you are really de-optimizing the domain for future development.

BlacklistHowever, I want to stress there are ways to mitigate the damage that parking can cause. If you want to trick a search engine into indexing a parking page you might be messing with fire. These search engine are smart and can see when you are just serving ads. Robots.txt should be used to exclude the entire site or the parking portion of the site from the search engines. If a domain name is robots.txt’ed off from the world it if very unlikely it will get put on a blacklist.

The better your domain, the more likely it will be delisted when parked. If other SEO people out there want that first position they will report you to Google using the Google Spam Removal Tool.

A lot of developers don’t want to buy a domain for a new site that has been blacklisted at Google. I however see opportunity. If you want to build a company on the domain there is no problem doing it. Buy the domain, Take down the parking page, place some content on the site, build some value to visitors, and then finally submit a Reinclusion Request to Google. I did this with DomainTools.com, I bought the domain from a guy who had adult content on the old site.

Reinclusion Highlight
When requesting reconsideration of a site that has violated the webmaster guidelines you will be asked to pledge no more violating the Google guidelines.

  • Upon reviewing your site, you found that it violated our webmaster guidelines and you’ve made changes to your site so that it adheres to the guidelines. [?]
  • OR

  • You recently acquired a domain which you suspect may have previously violated our webmaster guidelines.

Once it is done they advise that it may take several weeks for the re-evaluation process.

Specifically the guideline say, “If your site participates in an affiliate program, make sure that your site adds value. Provide unique and relevant content that gives users a reason to visit your site first.” In other words, if you just display ads there is no unique content. Google will remove your domain from its Search Engine and put you in the blacklist.

Posted in Domain Parking, Google | 13 Comments »

           Older Posts »